When an old ally wounds Canada’s identity

By Ralph Pirozzo

 Brisbane, Australia

I write as a proud Canadian-Australian who is experiencing something I never imagined possible: watching Canada’s sovereignty, economic security and national identity being repeatedly challenged by the country it has long regarded as its closest neighbour and ally.

Ralph Pirozzo

This is not an abstract diplomatic disagreement to me.

Canada is my beloved country.

To witness its name, dignity and independence treated as though they may be diminished, negotiated away or simply disregarded is profoundly painful.

The United States has imposed tariffs affecting Canadian steel, aluminium, automobiles and softwood lumber. These measures have been introduced despite the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), which was intended to provide stability, predictability and largely tariff-free trade across North America.

The Canadian Government has described tariffs imposed against Canadian goods as unjustified and in violation of CUSMA and World Trade Organization obligations. Some measures remain the subject of formal legal challenges. Whatever their eventual legal determination, punitive tariffs imposed against a close ally strike at the trust upon which such an agreement depends.

Then there is the Gordie Howe International Bridge.

Canada financed this approximately C$6.4 billion international crossing between Windsor and Detroit. Yet, as part of the agreement reached to secure its opening, Canada agreed to make payments equal to 50 per cent of the bridge’s net revenue during its first 15 fiscal years into an economic-development fund controlled by the United States Government. The purposes of that fund are to be agreed upon by both countries and are intended to benefit the United States and trade between the two nations.

Now something even more confronting has occurred.

Gordie Howe International Bridge

On August 27, 2026, the President of the United States signed an executive order directing that Lake Ontario be renamed “Lake America” throughout the United States federal government. The order requires the new name to be entered into the official United States geographic-names system and used on federal maps, contracts, documents and communications.

The United States cannot change the name by which Canada knows Lake Ontario.

Nevertheless, the act itself matters.

Lake Ontario is not merely water on a map. Its name is inseparable from Canadian geography, history, identity and belonging. It forms part of the Great Lakes system shared by two sovereign countries. No one country owns that history or possesses the moral authority to rename the whole of it unilaterally.

I ask Caribbean readers to imagine another government announcing that the Caribbean Sea would henceforth be called the “Sea of America” on all its official maps and in all its documents and communications.

Such a declaration would have no legal force in the countries and territories of the Caribbean. It could not change the name by which Caribbean people know the sea, nor could it diminish the sovereignty of the nations whose shores it touches.

But would Caribbean people regard it as harmless?

Or would they experience it as an extraordinary affront — an attempt by an outside power to impose its own name upon waters inseparable from the region’s history, identity and belonging?

The Caribbean Sea is not merely an expanse of water separating islands and continental shores.

It connects a remarkably diverse region whose peoples have endured colonisation, enslavement and foreign domination, struggled for freedom and self-determination, and built proud and independent nations.

Its waters carry memories of suffering and resistance, migration and renewal, separation and homecoming. They are woven into the culture, history and identity of Caribbean people throughout the world.

For another country to impose its own name upon the Caribbean Sea, even within that country’s official documents, would therefore mean far more than changing a few words on a map.

It would wound.

Canadians are entitled to feel no less deeply about Lake Ontario.

Many Caribbean Canadians understand what it means to carry love for one country into the life they have built in another. They have enriched Canada immeasurably while continuing to honour the histories, cultures and sacrifices of the Caribbean.

I understand that feeling.

More than fifty years ago, my wife and I left Canada to begin a new life in Australia. Australia eventually granted me citizenship without asking me to renounce my Canadian citizenship. It allowed me to embrace my new country without ceasing to love the country that educated and shaped me.

That is why the renaming of Lake Ontario reaches so deeply into my heart.

Canada does not ask Caribbean Canadians to choose between the countries of their heritage and the country in which they now live. Nor does Canada ask anyone to become hostile towards the United States.

Friendship with one country does not require silence when another friend is being wounded.

What Canada needs now is to hear that it is not alone—that its sovereignty matters, its identity matters and its friends will not quietly look away while either is treated with contempt.

Sometimes friendship is demonstrated not through grand declarations, but through the simple willingness to stand beside an old friend during a difficult hour.

This is such an hour.

Ralph Pirozzo is a Canadian born, independent education consultant based in Brisbane, Australia.

 

You must be logged in to post a comment Login